Georgia Extension Vegetable News
The University of Georgia
Cooperative Extension Service
College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences / P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793
Trade names are for information only. The Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences does not guarantee or warrant any product mentioned; neither does the use of a trade or brand imply approval of any product to the exclusion of others which may also be suitable.

PDF File

Volume1, No.1   Jan-Feb 2001

Contents...
New virus threatens cabbage & collards
New fungicide labels for vegetables
Be ready for bacterial fruit blotch
Applying Curbit® in cucurbits
Stale seedbed weed control in cucurbits
New TSWV resistant pepper
_________________________________________________________________________________________

New Virus Threatens Cabbage & Collards in Georgia

David Langston
Extension Vegetable Pathologist - UGA

This past fall, several samples of cabbage and collard plants were received at the plant disease clinic in Tifton that exhibited severely crinkled leaves that also showed some mosaic patterns (Figure 1). These plants came from Brooks, Colquitt, Grady and Pierce counties. Using PCR (polymerase chain reaction) techniques it was determined that the affected plants tested positive for geminivirus. The PCR product was sequenced and was found to be similar to Cabbage Leaf Curl Virus (CLCV) which was first reported in Florida in 1992. This type of virus is spread by whiteflies and is the same type of virus as Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) which we have had problems with for the past two years due to high whitefly populations in the fall. When CLCV was first reported in Florida it was not very serious and is currently observed at low (sub-economic) incidence levels according to University of Florida Extension Pathologist Dr. Tom Kucharek. However, outbreaks in Georgia have been quite serious and have caused up to 100% loss in some of the more severely affected fields. For the upcoming year, please attempt to record information on cultivars, transplant sources, weather information, and time of disease onset so that we may develop a database from which to work from on this particular disease.


Figure 1. Cabbage infected with Cabbage Leaf Curl Virus showing symptoms of crinkled leaves and mosaic patterns.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

New Fungicide Labels for Vegetables

David Langston
Extension Vegetable Pathologist - UGA

Several new pesticide labels have been acquired on vegetables since last year. Most of these materials are new only to vegetables as they have been used in other crops for years. Some products are new chemistry and some are active ingredients under different trade names. In any case, please refer to the manufacturers label and the Pest Control Handbook for details on each chemical. In many cases, similar active ingredients under different trade names are labeled differently. The following are some of the labels that I feel will have the most significant impact on vegetable disease management.
NOVA® Rohm& Haas - (myclobutanil) Currently labeled on cucurbits for powdery mildew control for which it provides excellent control. It is also labeled on snap beans for rust and Rhizoctonia pod blight. I have no direct efficacy data on Nova for efficacy on snap beans. EQUUS® Griffin LLC - (chlorothalonil) A comparable chlorothalonil product to Bravo®.
FLOURONIL® Agtrol - (4.4% mefenoxam + 72% chlorothalonil) This product is comparable to Ridomil Gold Bravo® but is labeled only for cucurbits, tomatoes and potatoes.
QUADRIS® Syngenta - (azoxystrobin) Label expanded in 2000 to include ca. 90 new crops. Check out the PDF file I sent out on 10/26/00 named "quadris_sup1000.pdf".
ACTIGARD® Syngenta - (acibenzolar) This is the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) eliciter that has been used in tobacco for blue mold. It is labeled on tomatoes for control of bacterial spot and speck.
Lately, several "soft" fungicides have been made available for vegetables. These materials are usually formulated biological control agents, disinfestants or plant defense activators. These materials are not recommended as "stand-alone" disease management tools but may enhance disease control under low disease pressure. Data (if available) indicates disease control with these products is inconsistent. These products are as follows:
SERENADE® AgraQuest - This material contains 10% of a dried Bacillus subtilis bacteria bio-control agent. It is labeled for control of certain foliar diseases (mainly powdery mildew) on cucurbits, leafy vegetables (except Brassica), pepper, potato and tomato.
MESSENGER® Eden Bioscience - Messenger is a product containing 3% harpin protein. This protein has been shown to elicit a plant defense response that increases plant vigor and helps plants fend-off disease. It is labeled for most vegetables and is very safe. Tests in Georgia have shown no benefit in disease control. It should not be used in chlorinated water or in water with a pH below 5.0 or above 10.0. Other use restrictions are noted on the label.
OXIDATE® Biosafe Sytems - This is a 27% hydrogen dioxide disinfestant material that is organically approved. This material must come in direct contact with target pests to be effective. Oxidate is highly corrosive and must be handled with care.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Be Ready for Bacterial Fruit Blotch


David Langston
Extension Vegetable Pathologist - UGA

Last year Georgia growers experienced several outbreaks of watermelon fruit blotch and a few isolated outbreaks of cantaloupe and pumpkin fruit blotch. This bacterial disease is seed-transmitted and can spread rapidly in greenhouses. If identified early, infected seedlings (Figures 2 & 3) should be discarded and asymptomatic plants in close proximity should be discarded, isolated form other watermelon seedlings, or sprayed intensely with copper materials. If symptoms of bacterial fruit blotch are found, plants should be sent to the plant disease clinic for biopsy as other bacterial pathogens that are not nearly as destructive as fruit blotch may produce symptoms identical to fruit blotch. If transplants already planted are suspected of having been infected with fruit blotch, weekly copper sprays of ½ the full rate of copper or bi-weekly sprays of the full copper rate are recommended prior to bloom development through fruit set. Once the waxy rind covering of watermelon fruit develops, susceptibility to fruit blotch significantly decreases.


Figures 2 and 3. Fruit blotch lesions on cantaloupe Fig 2 and watermelon Fig 3 transplants, respectively.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Applying Curbit in Cucurbits

Stanley Culpepper
Extension Weed Scientist - UGA

Ted Webster
USDA Weed Scientist - Tifton

Curbit is labeled for use in several cucurbit crops including cucumbers, melons, pumpkins, summer and winter squash, and watermelons. Although these cucurbits usually respond similarly to Curbit, squash tends to be more sensitive under adverse growing conditions; thus, minimizing rates in squash is recommended. Suggested use rates vary by soil type as described in Table 1.


Table 1. Curbit Section 2 (ee) for Georgia Cucurbits.
Soil Texture
Curbit Rate
(broadcast)
Coarse
1.0 to 1.5 pt/A
Medium
1.5 to 2.0 pt/A
Fine
2.0 pt/A

These rates of Curbit are low compared to similar herbicide chemistries in row crop agriculture. Although higher Curbit rates would be beneficial for extended weed control, minimizing the potential for crop injury is often more critical. Also, the shorter growing season often requires a shorter period of residual weed control. At recommended use rates, both grasses and small-seeded broadleaf weeds such
as pigweeds will usually be suppressed and often controlled under ideal growing conditions. Curbit must be activated by rainfall or irrigation.
Matching Curbit rate and soil type is crucial; of similar importance is application method. First, never incorporate Curbit into the soil. Secondly, apply Curbit as a pre-emergence treatment prior to cucurbit emergence. Finally, only administer Curbit as a band application between rows after crop emergence or transplant.

In spite of proper application techniques and appropriate Curbit rates, many growers experienced severe crop injury due to Curbit in 2000 (Figure 4). When large rainfall events occur within several days of planting and Curbit application, injury will likely be observed, especially in areas where water pools. It is difficult to eliminate this potential problem from occurring; however, delaying Curbit applications prior to an expected significant rainfall event would be beneficial to reduce potential injury. As a reminder, though, Curbit does need some form of water for activation and should be applied prior to crop and weed emergence.


Figure 4. Cucumber Injury from Curbit during 2000. Swollen hypocotyl often continues to enlarge and begins to crack increasing the likelihood of disease infestations and becomes more susceptible to drought and wind damage.
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Stale Seedbed Weed Control in Cucurbits

Stanley Culpepper
Extension Weed Scientist - UGA

Carroll Johnson
USDA Weed Scientist - Tifton

Acceptable weed management in cucurbit vegetable crops grown in the southeastern U.S. is difficult to achieve. The few herbicides registered for cucurbits effectively control grass species but seldom control large-seeded broadleaf weeds or perennial sedges.

New herbicides are registered less frequently for vegetable crops than for agronomic crops because fewer acres planted result in fewer herbicide sales. Furthermore, vegetable crops usually have higher unit crop value than agronomic crops, resulting in greater liability to herbicide manufacturers and distributors. Thus, growers of minor crops such as vegetables are often limited with herbicide tools to manage weeds.

One weed control practice showing potential as a component of an integrated weed management system is stale seedbed weed control. A stale seedbed is defined as a seedbed prepared several days or weeks prior to planting or transplanting the crop. As the seedbed is prepared, weed seed germination is stimulated. Once the weed seed have germinated, a non-selective herbicide can be applied for control of most of the more common and troublesome weed species. Once a non-selective herbicide has been applied to control emerged weeds, care must be taken to minimize soil movement at planting to limit additional weed seed germination.

Several points of caution are warranted when relying on non-selective herbicide applications in stale seedbed production. First, non-selective herbicides such as glyphosate and paraquat do not control all weeds infesting Georiga vegetables. Most notably, Florida pusley will not be consistently controlled by any postemergence herbicide system. Secondly, adverse weather conditions can negatively impact weed control by a non-selective herbicide. It is crucial at the time of planting that all weeds are controlled since emerged weeds at time of planting pose a significant threat for reducing yields.

In situations where weeds have already emerged on stale seedbeds but can not be controlled by non-selective herbicides, repetitive shallow tillage practices often can be an effective alternative to non-selective herbicides. Multiple shallow tillage operations control germinating and emerged weeds, thus reducing the number of viable weed seed that would germinate during crop development.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
New TSWV Resistant Pepper

William Terry Kelley
Extension Horticulturist - UGA

Novartis/Rogers Brand Seed has released the first bell pepper variety that is resistant to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus. The new pepper has been named "Stiletto" and is now available from most distributors of Rogers Brand Vegetable Seed. "Stiletto" is a blocky, green to red bell pepper. It is not recommended for red harvest, however, and should be used only for the green bell market. The selection has been trialed extensively over the past few years and has shown remarkable resistance to TSWV while producing acceptable yields and quality for the large to jumbo market. In addition to its virus resistance, the pepper also has resistance to races 1, 2 and 3 of bacterial leaf spot.


Georgia Extension Vegetable News

Volume 1, No.1. Jan-Feb 2001
Editor David B. Langston, Jr.
Production Assistant & Webmaster Paul Sumner

The Georgia Extension Vegetable News is published bimonthly for Jan-Feb, Sept-Oct, and Nov-Dec and monthly March-Aug. This newsletter is also available on the World Wide Web at www.cpes.peachnet.edu/veg or www.ugaveg.org.