![]() |
Georgia Extension Vegetable News |
| Volume1, No.3 | April 2001 | |||
| Contents...
Bacterial leaf spot control in tomato & pepper Bacterial Leaf Spot Control in Tomato & Pepper David Langston Growers of peppers and tomatoes have had a break from bacterial leaf spot on pepper and tomato for the past two years due to very dry growing seasons. Sure we have seen a few serious outbreaks but not widespread epidemics. A wet year this year could spell a change in bacterial spot severity and control. Bacterial spot of both vegetables is caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria on tomato in some newer publications). There are several strains that attack only one host and some that can attack both pepper and tomato. Spread and severity of bacterial spot is driven by weather in that warm (75-87o F), humid, wet periods favor the disease. Sources of inoculum for bacterial spot include weeds, crop debris, volunteer plants, and seed. Control for bacterial spot in both pepper and tomato should be a multi-tactic approach utilizing: 1. Pathogen-free seed and transplants; 2. Seed treated with NaOH (clorox); 3. Crop rotation with non-host plants so that peppers/tomatoes are grown in the same field only every 3 - 4 years; 4. Deep plow or remove potentially infested plant debris; 5. Avoid working in wet fields; 6. Eliminate wild solanaceous host plants such as nightshade and ground cherry; 7. Use of preventive copper/EBDC tank mixes applied at least weekly; 8. Use varieties resistant to one or more races of the bacterial spot pathogen (mainly pepper containing the Bs2 gene which confers resistance to bacterial spot races 0-3). 9. Application of the plant defense activator Actigard® on tomatoes. There is much speculation concerning whether to use Actigard and/or copper-maneb sprays for bacterial spot suppression in tomatoes. Cost is a primary issue as Actigard generally costs $15 - 40/acre per application while copper-maneb applications cost $8 - 9/acre. Actigard can also cause some yield delay and does not seem to confer TSWV suppression in field trials conducted in Grady Co. Data from several states suggests that Actigard may be a more viable choice where copper resistant bacteria occur. However, Actigard has been shown to reduce bacterial spot as good as copper-maneb sprays in replicated field trials. Overall, more information is needed on copper sensitivity in GA bacterial spot populations before widespread use of Actigard can be fully utilized. Shipping Sweet Corn to California David Adams
Soil Insect Problems David Adams Problems associated with soil insects seems to be on the increase. Since the losses of the long residual soil insecticides such as Chlordane, we have steadily lost the next level of soil insecticides such as Furadan and Dyfonate. Currently our only alternatives are fallowing, fumigation, or conventional insecticides such as Lorsban and Diazinon. These will continue to prove less than adequate for certain pests. One of the primary soil insects from years past is the whitefringed beetle larvae. Dyfonate was about 70 to 80 percent effective at the highest rate under ideal situations. Lorsban and diazinon have never been very effective on WFB. The remainder of alternatives has very limited efficacy. Whitefringed beetle infestations are very unpredictable even though they can be sampled for during land preparation. A problem this year does not preclude a problem the following year. WFB have one and a partial generation per year. WFB adults lay eggs in the summer and the larvae develop in the fall and over the winter and spring. This means they are present in their most damaging stage during spring plantings. When damage occurs replanting does not often offset the problem. I have seen fields transplanted as many as three times and still not have an economic stand for production. WFB can be found in most any new ground situation such as cleared fence rows, behind turf or pasture. As we move through time, other soil insects will become more prevalent problems. Wireworms, white grubs, southern corn rootworms and lesser cornstalk borers are the main ones coming to mind. It is not a doomsday message relative to these pests, but an observation that growers are in a precarious new age when we will no longer have the soil fumigation potential that we have today. I am not looking forward to scouting for adult beetles and expending monies for prevention of egglaying, especially since there is no way to predict that you will have a problem, and the investment is being made on the current crop for a future crop. Needless to say, we have to look forward for solutions, not bury ourselves with the inevitable.
Select 2 EC Herbicide Receives Additional Vegetable Labels Stanley Culpepper Through efforts of IR-4 and Valent U.S.A. Corporation, Select has obtained additional uses in several commonly grown vegetables in South Georgia (Table 1). Select is a postemergence graminicide that effectively controls most emerged annual grasses such as crabgrass, Texas panicum, and broadleaf signalgrass and suppresses growth of perennial grasses such as bermudagrass. According to the new supplemental label, always use a crop oil concentrate at 1% v/v in the finished spray volume unless tank mix instructions indicate otherwise.
Spray Nozzles and Application Rates Spray nozzle section is one of the most important decisions to be made related to pesticide applications. The type of nozzle determines not only the amount of spray applied, but also the uniformity of the applied spray, the coverage obtained on the sprayed surfaces, and the amount of drift that can occur. Each nozzle type has specific characteristics and capabilities and is designed for use under certain application conditions. The types which are commonly used for ground application of agricultural chemicals for vegetables are the fan and cone nozzles. Herbicides Insecticides and Fungicides Nozzle Material
Tifton Plant Disease Clinic Jason Brock During the past month, the Tifton Plant Disease Clinic continued to receive many samples from greenhouses. Winter crops and spring transplants also suffered from field diseases. Transplanting should come to an end during the coming month. With the plants being in the field, a wider range of diseases might be seen. Questions have been asked about the meaning of "No Disease", "Disease Symptoms", and other such diagnoses. I will give a simple explanation as to how we use these terms. "Disease Symptom" is used when we suspect that a disease is the problem, but we cannot confirm. "No Disease" is used when we are confident the problem is not a disease, but we do not have enough information to go beyond that claim. When we do have more information, we will use "environmental", "chemical phytotoxicity", "physical injury" or more specific diagnoses. The next page is a summary of the commercial vegetable samples received during the past month.
Georgia Extension Vegetable News
The Georgia Extension Vegetable News is published bimonthly for Jan-Feb, Sept-Oct, and Nov-Dec and monthly March-Aug. This newsletter is also available on the World Wide Web at www.cpes.peachnet.edu/veg or www.ugaveg.org. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||